Refactor code structure for improved readability and maintainability

specs/001-safety-reliability-refactor/checklists/requirements.md

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# Specification Quality Checklist: Safety, Reliability & Idiomatic Refactor
+
+**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
+**Created**: 2026-03-03
+**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
+
+## Content Quality
+
+- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
+- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
+- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
+- [x] All mandatory sections completed
+
+## Requirement Completeness
+
+- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
+- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
+- [x] Success criteria are measurable
+- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
+- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
+- [x] Edge cases are identified
+- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
+- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
+
+## Feature Readiness
+
+- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
+- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
+- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
+- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
+
+## Notes
+
+- FR-010 references "Go 1.20" as an explicit user constraint, not a technology recommendation — this is acceptable per the user's requirement for legacy system compatibility.
+- The spec references "atomic write pattern" and "CNAME chains" as behavioral descriptions, not implementation prescriptions. The planning phase will determine specific implementation approaches.
+- All checklist items pass. Spec is ready for `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`.